SAKSHI NARSING DESHATWAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
WP/1769/2025 · 2025-02-06
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8308 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8308 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
957.WP.1769.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1769 OF 2025 SAKSHI NARSING DESHATWAD VERSUS
1. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THR. ITS SECRETARY MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI – 400 001
2. SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, KINWAT HEAD-QUARTER AT CHHATRAPATI SAMBHAJI NAGAR THR. ITS MEMBER SECRETARY ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Phatale Sagar S. AGP for Respondents: Ms. S.S. Joshi ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATE : 06.02.2025 PER COURT: Heard.
2. The impugned order refuses to validate petitioner’s ‘Mannervarlu’ scheduled tribe certificate.
3. The order under challenge is a common order in the matter of the petitioner and her brother Sarthak. In Writ Petition No.749/2025 by the order dated 16.01.2025, the impugned order was quashed and set aside to his extent and he was held entitled to have a certificate of validity. 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:3429-DB
957.WP.1769.25.odt
4. No separate view is possible in the present matter in respect of the selfsame judgment and order.
5. The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The Committee shall issue certificate of validity to the petitioner, which shall be co-terminus with the validities, which the committee has decided to reopen.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb/ 2/2