SUMARA MAJEED AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND ORS
WP(C)/1689/2025 · 2025-07-18
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8307 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8307 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 78 Supplementary List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1689/2025
Sumara Majeed and Anr.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Kausar Aazam, Advocate.
VERSUS
Union Territory J&K and Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 18.07.2025
1. The petitioners seek a direction upon official respondents to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 5 and 6 owing to the reason of having married against the wishes of said respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
2. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and out of their free will they got married. Copy of Nikahnama has been placed on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court passed in case titled as in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and another 2006 (5) SCC 475, and would submit that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.
4. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police is duty bound to
protect the life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them.
5. In this view of the matter, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, by providing that the official respondents shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and if grievances are found to be genuine, they shall ensure that nobody interferes in their married life, if they approach them. However, this order shall not come in the way of the investigation of FIR, registered, if any.
6. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of the marriage of the petitioners.
7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Rajnesh Oswal)
Judge
SRINAGAR 18.07.2025 Sabreena