- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35141 RSA No. 104 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2020 (SP) BETWEEN: SRI. MOHAMMED KHAJA S/O LATE MOHAMMED NAWAZ KHAN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NO.85, C/O SYED BABU, M.B. ROAD, NARASAPURA VILLAGE KOLAR- 563 133. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAHUL S REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA S/O ABBAIAH DEAD BY HIS L.R.'S 1. SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 2. SRI. MANJU S/O CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 3. SRI. VENKATARAJU S/O LATE CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 4. SRI. BABU S/O LATE CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35141 RSA No. 104 of 2020 RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT TALI-HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL 562 114. 5. SRI. MUKTHIYAR PASHA S/O LATE BASHA SAB AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT KATTIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL 562 114. 6. SRI. N. JAYARAMA REDDY S/O NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/A NO.1048, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 034. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R-6; R-1 TO R-5 - SERVED) *** THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN R.A.NO.84/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT KOLAR AND IN O.S. NO. 181/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KOLAR AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.10.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.84/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, AT KOLAR AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMNT AND DECREE DATED 19.07.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.181/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KOLAR. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35141 RSA No. 104 of 2020 THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER A memo for retirement filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, with a copy of E-mail is accepted. 2. In fact, this Court granted time from 22.08.2025 till today, to enable the appellant to engage the services of another counsel, but the appellant has not chosen to engage another counsel. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7