Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83056 (KAR)

SRI. KRISHNAPRAKASH v. SRI. S. NARAYANASWAMY

CRP/251/2024 · 2025-12-05

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53355 CRP No. 251 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 251 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI. KRISHNAPRAKASH S/O. HARIHARAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT ARJUNABETTAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA K, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. S. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O. SRINIVASAMURTHY, R/AT CHIKKABETTAHALLI VILLAGE, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560 097. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SAMPATH A, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.VII IN OS NO.501/2020 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, REJECTING THE IA NO.VII FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53355 CRP No. 251 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo. Memo reads as under: “The undersigned herewith prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to grant liberty to prosecute the O.S.No.501/2020 with all contentions raised in order 7 Rule 11 application before the Trial Court by taking defence under Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act. In the above circumstances the petitioner prays to permit to withdraw the petition.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53355 CRP No. 251 of 2024 However, all the defences including the question of contingency having not arisen in respect of one of the items of the suit property shall be urged by the revision petitioner in the trial in accordance with law. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8