ANNU PRIYA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/15611/2025 · 2026-07-21
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8305 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8305 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 239
Annu Priya and others
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents in conducting the online transfer drive for Assistant District A and Deputy District Attorneys without displaying all the available vacant posts for exercising options/preferences, in violation of the Online Transfer Policy dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus di respondents to conduct the online transfer drive strictly in accordance with the said policy by making available all vacant posts, along with a further prayer for staying the ongoing online transfer drive initiated CWP-15611-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.15611 of 2025
Date of decision : Annu Priya and others Versus Haryana and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Sunil Kumar Nehra (Sirsa), Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents in conducting the online transfer drive for Assistant District A and Deputy District Attorneys without displaying all the available vacant posts for exercising options/preferences, in violation of the Online Transfer Policy dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus di respondents to conduct the online transfer drive strictly in accordance with the said policy by making available all vacant posts, along with a further prayer for staying the ongoing online transfer drive initiated
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15611 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-21.07.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sunil Kumar Nehra (Sirsa), Advocate Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents in conducting the online transfer drive for Assistant District Attorneys and Deputy District Attorneys without displaying all the available vacant posts for exercising options/preferences, in violation of the Online Transfer Policy dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P-4), and for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct the online transfer drive strictly in accordance with the said policy by making available all vacant posts, along with a further prayer for staying the ongoing online transfer drive initiated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.23 19.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
vide Memo dated 22.05.2025 (A the present writ petition.
submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
present writ petition is disposed of as prayed for.
July 21, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Yes / No
CWP-15611-2025 (O & M) vide Memo dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure P the present writ petition.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection in case the present writ petition is disposed of as prayed for.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 nnexure P-3) during the pendency of At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the State has no objection in case the present writ petition is disposed of as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.23 19.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document