Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8305 (PNJ)

ANNU PRIYA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/15611/2025 · 2026-07-21

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 239 Annu Priya and others State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents in conducting the online transfer drive for Assistant District A and Deputy District Attorneys without displaying all the available vacant posts for exercising options/preferences, in violation of the Online Transfer Policy dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus di respondents to conduct the online transfer drive strictly in accordance with the said policy by making available all vacant posts, along with a further prayer for staying the ongoing online transfer drive initiated CWP-15611-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15611 of 2025 Date of decision : Annu Priya and others Versus Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sunil Kumar Nehra (Sirsa), Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents in conducting the online transfer drive for Assistant District A and Deputy District Attorneys without displaying all the available vacant posts for exercising options/preferences, in violation of the Online Transfer Policy dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus di respondents to conduct the online transfer drive strictly in accordance with the said policy by making available all vacant posts, along with a further prayer for staying the ongoing online transfer drive initiated 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15611 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-21.07.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sunil Kumar Nehra (Sirsa), Advocate Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents in conducting the online transfer drive for Assistant District Attorneys and Deputy District Attorneys without displaying all the available vacant posts for exercising options/preferences, in violation of the Online Transfer Policy dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P-4), and for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct the online transfer drive strictly in accordance with the said policy by making available all vacant posts, along with a further prayer for staying the ongoing online transfer drive initiated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.23 19.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document vide Memo dated 22.05.2025 (A the present writ petition. submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. present writ petition is disposed of as prayed for. July 21, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Yes / No CWP-15611-2025 (O & M) vide Memo dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure P the present writ petition. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Learned counsel for the State has no objection in case the present writ petition is disposed of as prayed for. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 nnexure P-3) during the pendency of At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the State has no objection in case the present writ petition is disposed of as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.23 19.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document