Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 83049 (PAT)

Ankit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./82674/2024 · 2025-02-10

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82674 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ankit Kumar S/O Umesh Rai Resident of Village - Bakhari Supayan, Ward No. 12, P.S- Rajapakar,Dist- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 140(3), 87 and 96 of the BNS, 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant. During course of investigation the victim was recovered and she has stated in her statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS wherein she has sated that this petitioner has called her on a shop and from there he took her to Hajipur in a car. The car was driven by Rishi. There she was kept in a rented room. She was not allowed to talk to anybody. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82674 of 2024(4) dt.10-02-2025 2/2 that the victim has categorically stated in her statement under Section 183 of the BNS Act that the petitioner had not done galat kaam with her. The petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. He is in custody since 19.07.2024. 5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 255 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class-cum-Additional Munsif-7th, Vaishali at Hajipur. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T