APHC010088832019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 3901/2019 Between: 1. K HEERAMAN NAIK, S/O. THULASI NAIK KOLLIYA AGED 50 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, SUGALI METTA, PANYAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRA AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, YSR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION CIRCLE, KADAPA. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DIVISION, KADAPA YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2 the 2nd respondent in issuing tender Notification No.SA/01/2018-19 dt.01.03.2019 uploaded in the website on 18.3.2019 with Special Condition No.6 and 35 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 the Constitution of India and to consequently setaside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the No. SA/ 01/ 2018-19 dt. 01.03.2019 uploaded in the website on 18.3.2019 issued by the 2 respondent pending disposal of Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.3901 of 2019 ORDER:- 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for further adjudication by this Court. 2. In view of the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioners, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand dismissed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date:28.07.2025 SP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.3901 of 2019 Date: 28.07.2025 W SP