Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 05
WPSB No.252 of 2019 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioners. The instant writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on
23.07.2025. Now, a Restoration Application, MCC No.15470 of 2025, along with Delay Condonation Application, IA No.15471 of 2025, has been filed. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the date of hearing, the counsel for the petitioners had gone out of station; none could appear on behalf of the petitioners, and that is how the petition was dismissed in non prosecution. It is also submitted that due to mistake of the clerk of the learned counsel, the restoration application could not be filed on time. Having considered, this Court is of the view that there are good grounds to condone the delay. The delay is condoned. The delay condonation application is allowed. Similarly, the petitioners have been able to show sufficient grounds for his non-appearance on the date of hearing. The restoration application is
allowed. Let the writ petition be restored to its original number. List this matter on 19.11.2025, for hearing.
(Alok Mahra J.) (Ravindra Maithani J.)
08.10.2025 RV