HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29327 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ram Kumar Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shekhar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Varun Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 187 of 2025, under Sections 137(2) B.N.S., Police Station-Etmaddaula, District Agra, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by about seven days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The victim is a consenting party as is but evident from the fact that she has taken away cash along with ornaments along with her with the applicant. The applicant is a lady and a false case has been foisted subsequently against her and she has nothing to do with the said offence. Reality is that the applicant is tenant and aunt (Mausi) of the victim and she has been falsely implicated in the instant case just to get the house vacated. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 25.06.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that FIR is delayed by about seven days, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Vineeta, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shekhar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vineeta .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 10, 2025 Karan BAIL No. 29327 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad