KUSUM CHAUDHARY v. JITENDER KUMAR DAHIYA AND OTHERS
COCP/3042/2024 · 2025-09-02
Alka Sarin
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83022 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83022 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3042-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.09.2025 KUSUM CHAUDHARY
.... Petitioner VERSUS JITENDER KUMAR DAHIYA & ORS
.... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Petitioner in person with her counsel
Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Ankit Yadav, Advocate.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Addl. AG Haryana.
Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate and Ms. Navjeet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.3.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the petitioner had received the entire amount. The petitioner, who is present in person, also states that the entire amount had been received by her.
2.
In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off as such. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
02.09.2025
(ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain
JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2025.09.03 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment