IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82565 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2024 Thana- MORKAHI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Jaykishor kumar, Son of Jay Narayan Mahto, Resident of Village- Samsa, P.S. - Nawkothi, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Anshul, Sr.Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 17-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) added Section 120(b) IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the brother of the informant, namely, Shambhu Kumar had gone for measuring land. After measurement, one Dinesh Rajak and Shambhu Kumar were returning on their TVS bike. Dinesh Rajak was his pillion and at 06:00 P.M., two bikers overtook and fired at Shambhu Kumar. He was rushed to the hospital where he died during his treatment. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82565 of 2024(3) dt.17-01-2025 2/3 petitioner has submitted that during investigation, one Prince Kumar was arrested. He in his confessional statement disclosed that in the said murder Vikesh Kumar Singh was contacted by him as the matrimonial house of his sister is there in village Marar and Mukesh Paswan was married to his sister. Vikesh Singh disclosed that Rs. 1.5 Lakh is to be spent for the murder. Then Prince Kumar came to his village and disclosed to one Jaykishor Kumar (petitioner) and demanded his bike for the occurrence. From the confessional statement of Prince Kumar it is clear that the role of Jaykishor Kumar is that he has provided his bike in the occurrence. It has been stated by Prince Kumar in his confessional statement that this petitioner was knowing the bike was used in the offence. According to the case of the prosecution the bike of petitioner was used but the petitioner is having no other role than providing the bike. 5. Learned APP for the Stated has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82565 of 2024(3) dt.17-01-2025 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.- I, Khagaria in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T