p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK COA No.3 of 2006 Sridhar Das and others …. Appellants Represented by Adv.- -versus- O.T.M. Ltd. and others …. Respondents Represented by Adv.- CORAM: JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO ORDER 20.06.2025 1. This appeal seeks to call in question a Company Court’s order dated 06.03.2006 in Company Act Case No.25 of 2001 confirming the order dated 25.08.2005, whereby 6th respondent is permitted to remove the plant and machinery from the subject site along with the existing structure. There is also a further direction for re-tendering the sale of the assets of the Orissa Textile Mills Limited (now in liquidation) with a condition to run the industry. 2. Having perused the appeal papers, we are not inclined to grant interference in the matter inasmuch as the order in question can be subject matter of a challenge, when the pending main matter is decided against the appellant herein on the line with the provisions of Order 43 Rule-1A Order No. 03. p. 2 of amended Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. No extraordinary reason is shown to us as to why that course cannot be adopted. 3. Above apart, the office objections are also not addressed despite giving opportunity nor there is any explanation for such culpable non- compliance. That gives a legitimate impression to the Court that the appellant is not interested any longer to prosecute this appeal. 4. In the above circumstances, this appeal is disposed of with above observations. ( Dixit Krishna Shripad ) Judge ( M.S. Sahoo ) Judge Prasant Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT