A KRISHNAPPA v. SHREE SARPABHUSHANA SHIVAYOGIGALA MATADA TRUST
CRP/111/2021 · 2025-11-05
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83006 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 83006 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44703 CRP No. 111 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.111 OF 2021 (SC) BETWEEN:
1.
A. KRISHNAPPA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES,
SMT SHANTHAMMA, AGE ABOUT 73 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE KRISHNAPPA GURUSWAMY NIVAS, NO.1025/13, 11TH MAIN, HAMPINAGARA, BENGALURU-560 104.
2.
SRI. SRINIVAS, AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF LATE KRISHNAPPA, GURUSWAMY NIVAS, NO. 1025/13, 11TH MAIN, HAMPINAGARA, BENGALURU-560 104.
3.
SMT BHARATHI, VASUDEVAMURTHY, AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE KRISHNAPPA, GURUSWAMY NIVAS, NO.1025/13, 11TH MAIN, HAMPINAGARA, BENGALURU-560 104.
4.
SMT K SUMITHRA, AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS,
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44703 CRP No. 111 of 2021
DAUGHTER OF LATE KRISHNAPPA, GURUSWAMY NIVAS, NO.1025/13, 11TH MAIN, HAMPINAGARA, BENGALURU -560 104. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMESH .K.R., ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
AND:
1.
SHREE SARPABHUSHANA SHIVAYOGIGALA MATADA TRUST, NO.22, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009, REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER.
2.
DR. GANESH S, M/S GURUSWAMY MEDICALS, SHOP NO C- 1 AND G- 1 OLD NO.19, SSB MUTT TRUST COMPLEX, KEMPEGOWDA CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALALI RAVIRAJ RAMANNA., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC. 18 OF THE SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 25.02.2021 PASSED IN SC.NO.1258/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDIIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EVICTION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44703 CRP No. 111 of 2021
ORAL ORDER
Case called twice. None present on behalf of the revision petitioners.
2. Petition is of the year 2021. Petitioners have suffered a decree before the Small Causes Court for ejectment in respect of the suit property.
3. Taking note of the fact that the matter is of the year 2021, yet to be admitted, petitioners are enjoying the pendency of the petition and have not vacated the premises, Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39