- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47239 WP No. 4352 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4352 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. N. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O HOTTE NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 2. K. THIPPAMMA W/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 3. SHANTHAMMA W/O VEERA KARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 4. RATHANAMMA W/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 5. SHIVALINGAMMA W/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 6. JAYAMMA W/O JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 7. LAKSHMIDEVI W/O J NAGABHUSHAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 8. GANGAMMA W/O SHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47239 WP No. 4352 of 2020 9. THIPPAMMA W/O CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 10. JAYAMMA W/O KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 11. BHAGYAMMA W/O THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 12. BALAMMA W/O THIPPERUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 13. GAYITHRAMMA W/O PANDAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 14. PANDAPPA G S S/O NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 15. CHIKKAMMA W/O DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 16. MANGALAMMA W/O YERAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 17. VINODHAMMA D/O YERANNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 18. ERAMMA W/O THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47239 WP No. 4352 of 2020 19. SHRUTHI W/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 20. E. PAVITHRA W/O MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 21. SHWETHA R. W/O ERANNA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 22. NAVEENA S S/O DILIP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 23. KUDURAMMA W/O THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 24. RATHNAMMA W/O VEERA KARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 25. BASAVARAJA S/O CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 26. THOPAMMA W/O CHAKRAPANI AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 27. T. SUNITHA W/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 28. THIPPAMMA W/O SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47239 WP No. 4352 of 2020 29. KRISHNAPPA S/O MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 30. THIPPAMMA W/O SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 31. KARIYAMMA W/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 32. VEERA KARIYANNA W/O HUCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 33. K. SHASHIKALA W/O SHIVARUDRAPPA B K AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 34. BALAKRISHNAMURTHY S/O KARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 35. CHANNAKKA W/O KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 36. SANTHAMMA W/O NARASINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 37. KARIYAMMA W/O NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 38. JAYAMMA W/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47239 WP No. 4352 of 2020 39. BALAMMA W/O NAGANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 40. THIPPAMMA W/O SANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 41. KARIYAMMA W/O B T KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 42. THIPPAMMA W/O SHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, 43. GANGAMMA W/O BASAVA JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS CUM COOLIE RESIDING AT SY NO.136 OF RADDIHALLY VILLAGE CHALLAKERE -522522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDAPPA B.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING BENGALURU -560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT CHITRADURGA -577 501. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47239 WP No. 4352 of 2020 3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA SUB DIVISION CHITRADURGA-577 501. 4. THE TAHSILDAR CHALLAKERE TALUK-577 522 CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 TO TAKE STEPS TO DISTRIBUTE THE SITES UNDER THE ASHRAYA YOJANE IN THE LAND BEARING NO.136 OF REDDYHALLI VILLAGE, IN WHICH 4 ACRES OF LAND ALREADY RESERVED FOR DISTRIBUTION OF SITES UNDER ASHRAYA SCHEME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47239 WP No. 4352 of 2020 2. In this writ petition, petitioners are seeking a writ of mandamus to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to take steps under the 'Ashraya Yojane' for distribution of sites. 3. In that view of the matter, if the petitioners approach the competent authority seeking allotment of site by way of representation, same shall be considered by the respondent - authority in accordance with law at the earliest. 4. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. I.A.1/2022 does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13