Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P(C) No. 28623 of 2025
Union of India & others …. Petitioners
Mr. M.K. Pati. S.P.C.
-versus- Sidda Gopaludu …. Opposite Party
Mr. Swapna Kumar Ojha, Advocate
W.P(C) No. 28641 of 2025
Union of India & others …. Petitioners
Mr. M.K. Pati. S.P.C.
-versus- V. Ramesh & others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. Swapna Kumar Ojha, Advocate
W.P(C) No. 28932 of 2025
Union of India & others …. Petitioners
Mr. M.K. Pati. S.P.C.
-versus- Netra Mani Nanda & Others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. Swapna Kumar Ojha, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No. 13.01.2026
04.
The subject matter of these Petitions is substantially similar to the one in W.P.(C) No.35395 of 2025, between
Union of India and others v. Satyabrata Dhupal and others heard and disposed off by this Court vide order dated 12.01.2026, wherein the operative portion of the order reads as under:
“In the above circumstances, this petition being devoid of merits is liable to be dismissed and accordingly it is. The order of the CAT, Cuttack is to be acted upon by the Opposite Parties within eight (8) weeks.”
2. Similar cases should be treated alike being the cardinal principle of adjudication, these cases also need to be decided in terms of cognate decision.
Ordered accordingly.
The Writ Petitions are disposed off.
(Dixit Krishna Shripad)
Judge
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Judge
Bijay/Sarbani Designation: Junior Stenographer