Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82993 (PNJ)

RUBY GILL v. GAURAV YADAV

COCP/3672/2025 · 2025-08-28

Sudeepti Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-3672-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 COCP-3672-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 28th, 2025 Ruby Gill ......Petitioner Vs. Gaurav Yadav .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Kanishk Swaroop, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 09.05.2024 passed by this Court in CRM-M-18146-2024. 2. The relevant portion of order dated 09.05.2024 passed by this Court in CRM-M-18146-2024, is reproduced as under:- “5. In the wake of the limited prayer of the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of and respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Punjab, Punjab Police Headquarters, Sector 9, Chandigarh, is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate steps, if any required, under the provisions of law. However, if respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the complaint dated 19.08.2023 (Annexure P-1), then the SAHIL 2025.09.02 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3672-2025 (O&M) -2- petitioner shall be duly informed as per the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. 2013 (4) RCR (Criminal) 979.” 3. Learned State counsel submits that in compliance of order dated 09.05.2024, a speaking order dated 26.08.2025 has been passed. Copy of the same has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner and also placed on record. 4. A perusal of speaking order dated 26.08.2025, shows that order dated 09.05.2024, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM- M-18146-2024, has been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. 5. In view of the above, the contempt is purged and rule is discharged. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE August 28th, 2025 Sahil Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAHIL 2025.09.02 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.