135 Subhash Chand ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & ors. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. Arav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Upasna Dhawan, Asst. A.G., Haryana Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.3 and 4 to take a decision on the communications dated 08.09.2025 and 03.11.2025 (Annexures P-7 and P-8) issued by respondent No.2 with regard to the alleged encroachment upon the petitioners land caused on account of the improper construction of the Chautang Nala. 2 Notice of motion. 3 Ms. Upasna Dhawan, Asst. A.G., Haryana appears and accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.24 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4 Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate appears on behalf of respondents No.3 & 4 and submits that the demarcation shall be effected after associating the petitioners within a period of eight weeks from today. 5 The said statement made by learned State counsel satisfies counsel for the petitioners. 6 Petition stands disposed off. ( PANKAJ JAIN ) 23.07.2026 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.24 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document