IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 104 Sukhwinder Singh Shashi Bala, College, Tanda Urmur (Tanda), Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P CWP-10172 others”, whereby, it was ordered as follows : a Speaking Order dated 26.6.2025 (Annexure P COCP-3599-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3599 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision : Sukhwinder Singh Versus Shashi Bala, Principal, Giani Kartar Singh Memorial Government College, Tanda Urmur (Tanda), Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate with Ms. Jyotika Behl, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kanav Singla, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this C 10172-2004 titled as “Sukhwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and others”, whereby, it was ordered as follows :- “xxx xxx xxx The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. xxx xxx xxx” Learned counsel for the petitioner a Speaking Order dated 26.6.2025 (Annexure P 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3599 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-25.07.2025 …..Petitioner Principal, Giani Kartar Singh Memorial Government College, Tanda Urmur (Tanda), Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Satbir Rathore, Advocate with Mr. Kanav Singla, AAG, Punjab. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated ordinate Bench of this Court in 2004 titled as “Sukhwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and - xxx The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admits that although a Speaking Order dated 26.6.2025 (Annexure P-8) has been passed by the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.25 20.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondent, however, the same is not in strict compliance of the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P contempt is made out as the directions of this Court vide order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P survives in the present petition. above) of the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P learned counsel for the petitioner that personal hearing was given to the petitioner on 18.6.2025 and a Speaking Order dated 26.6.2025 P-8) has been duly passed. passed in the present petition, the same is Speaking Order dated 26.6.2 to challenge the same, if so advised, as per law. July 25, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3599-2025 (O & M) respondent, however, the same is not in strict compliance of the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by co Learned counsel for the respondent contempt is made out as the directions of this Court vide order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P-1) have been complied with; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Heard. Pursuant to the directions, as contained in para 7 (reproduced above) of the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P learned counsel for the petitioner that personal hearing was given to the petitioner on 18.6.2025 and a Speaking Order dated 26.6.2025 8) has been duly passed. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of Needless to say, if the petitioner is aggrieved to the said Speaking Order dated 26.6.2025 (Annexure P to challenge the same, if so advised, as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Vijay Asija speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 respondent, however, the same is not in strict compliance of the order 1) passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. counsel for the respondent-State submits that no contempt is made out as the directions of this Court vide order dated 1) have been complied with; thus, no cause directions, as contained in para 7 (reproduced above) of the order dated 28.2.2025 (Annexure P-1), it is acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner that personal hearing was given to the petitioner on 18.6.2025 and a Speaking Order dated 26.6.2025 (Annexure In view of the above, no further orders are required to be disposed of accordingly. Needless to say, if the petitioner is aggrieved to the said 025 (Annexure P-8), liberty is granted to him to challenge the same, if so advised, as per law. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.25 20.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document