136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.47871 of 2025 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 Sushant Kush …Petitioner Versus Hemant …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present :- None for the petitioner. ***** H.S.GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the Court today. 2. On perusal of the record, it is evident that on 05.09.2025, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner sought an adjournment. Thereafter, on 30.10.2025 and 19.03.2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that he is no more interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of non- prosecution. (H.S.GREWAL) 23.07.2026 JUDGE seema Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2026.07.24 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment No. of 202 -2- SEEMA SHARMA 2026.07.24 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment