Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82968 (PNJ)

HARSHDEEP SINGH ALIAS HARMANDEEP SINGH JASSAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/40257/2025 · 2025-07-30

H S Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-40257-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 102 AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40257-2025 Date of decision: 30.07.2025 HARSHDEEP SINGH @ HARMANDEEP SINGH @JASSAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Nikhil Kumar Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 93 dated 27.06.2025 under Sections 21, 29 of NDPS Act registered at Police Station City-2 Abohar, District Fazilka and for setting aside the impugned order dated 10.07.2025 vide which the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been dismissed. 2. The case of the prosecution is that 20 grams of heroin was recovered from the three co-accused namely Tarun Sidana, Mohit and Gaurav, who have disclosed the name of the present petitioner as the supplier of the contraband. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case only on the basis of disclosure statement suffered by the co-accused. The petitioner has nothing do with the alleged allegations. He further submits that the shop of the petitioner was raided by the police prior to the incident. The petitioner is ready and willing to join the Renu Rawat 2025.08.02 12.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40257-2025 2 investigation. 4. Notice of motion. 5. Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. He has opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is involved in four more cases out of which three are under NDPS Act and one is under Excise Act. 6. I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record. 7. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is involved in four more cases, which shows that the petitioner is a habitual offender and has criminal antecedents; no ground is made out to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed. 30.07.2025 (H.S.GREWAL) renu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.08.02 12.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document