. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2240 of 2024 . Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Although, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents is present but none appeared on behalf of petitioners even in the revised call. 2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel sought the attention of the court over the documents appended for substantiating the prayer as made in the petition but at the same time, it is also intimated by learned Standing Counsel that the instant petition has been preferred in the year 2024 and at present, no cause of action is surviving and as such, the prayer made in the petition has become redundant. 4. Considering the arguments raised by learned Standing Counsel, it is crystal clear that the instant matter has been preferred at the behest of petitioners for prayer mentioned herein but the same was perpetuating against the adverse situation available before petitioners in the year and time when the instant petition has been filed. 5. At present, no cause of action survives for pressing the instant petition preferred at the behest of the petitioners and as such, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt Ragini And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. However, it is made clear that the protection granted earlier to the petitioners is hereby discontinued and extension shall be subject to fresh assessment made by concerned police authority. September 12, 2025 #Vik/- WRIC No. 2240 of 2024 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad