Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82957 (KAR)

B V PASHUPATHI v. SRI UMAPATHI

RSA/1197/2024 · 2025-09-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH AND SRI. MAHESH SHETTY, MEMBER REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1197 OF 2024 (Lok Adalat No.5988/2025 ) BETWEEN: B.V. PASHUPATHI S/O LATE VEERABHADRAPPAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT MAGODU, BESURU VILLAGE HULIDEVARABANA POST SAGAR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577401. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. UMAPATHI S/O LATE VEERABHADRAPPAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT MAGODU BESURU VILLAGE NOW R/AT NO.41, SRI KRUPA KERIYAPPA LAYOUT DOLLORS COLONY DEVASANDRA BENGALURU -560094. - 2 - 2. NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE GANGADARAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 3. GOWRAV S/O NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 4. ADVIKA D/O NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/AT NO.149, 8TH CROSS MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 562 114. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.S. SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.02.2024 PASSED IN R.A. NO.52/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL., SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.02.2020 PASSED IN OS.NO.148/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAGAR. THIS RSA COMING BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT TODAY, ON BEING REFERRED BY THE COURT, E.S.INDIRESH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- - 3 - CONCILIATION ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the parties along with the parties are present before the Court. It is submitted by parties that respondent No.4 is pregnant and as such, she has authorised respondent No.3 for settlement in the matter. The said submission is accepted by all the parties. 2. The joint memo signed by all the parties and their learned counsel identified them. Accordingly, the joint memo dated 13.09.2025, is hereby accepted. 3. The Regular Second Appeal No.1197/2024 is hereby disposed of in terms of the joint memo dated 13.09.2025, filed by the parties. It is made clear that, since the Final Decree Proceedings are pending consideration before the Trial Court, and as such, it is open for the parties to file the necessary sketch before the Court below in the Final Decree Proceedings, in respect of respective division of the extent and for effecting boundaries with regard to their respective shares. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER sac