- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33986 WP No. 17977 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.17977 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. S. SAVITHRAMMA, D/O LATE. SRI.Y.SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R.AT NO.5, 30TH CROSS 30TH MAIN, BSK 2ND STAGE BENGALURU – 560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G B NANDISH GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S BUILDING DR.B.R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT K.G ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION K.G ROAD KANDAYA BHAVAN BENGALURU – 560 009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL – 562 106, Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33986 WP No. 17977 of 2025 5. SRI.S.P.JAYAPAL S/O SRI.D.N. RUDRAIAH SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S SUMANGALA W/O S.P JAYAPAL 6. SMT.J. SHWETHA D/O LATE. S.P JAYAPAL AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 7. SMT. SOURABHA D/O LATE.S.P JAYAPAL AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 7 ARE R.AT NO.132, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, BAPUJI LAYOUT CHANDRA LAYOUT BENGALURU – 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO 4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2024 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT i.e. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT IN REVISION PETITION NO.92/2016-17 BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-M. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33986 WP No. 17977 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents No.1 to 4. Notice to respondent Nos.5 to 7 is not necessary for the following reasons: 2. The petitioner is aggrieved of the dismissal of the revision petition filed by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent – Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District, for non-prosecution. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that after the revision petition was filed, on no date of hearing was the petitioner absent. However, on one fine day, the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Learned Counsel for the petitioner therefore, submits that the matter may be restored while directing the Deputy Commissioner to consider the matter on merits. 4. The submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of while restoring RP No.92/16-17 on the file of the 2nd - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33986 WP No. 17977 of 2025 respondent – Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner to issue notice and thereafter, proceed to hear the matter on merits. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37