BASAPPA S/O MAHAGUNDAPPA ALIAS MAGUNDAPPA KANTHI ALIAS GAJI v. BHAIRAPPA S/O MAHAGUNDAPPA ALIAS MAGUNDAPPA KANTHI ALIAS GAJI
RP/100183/2024 · 2025-03-28
E S Indiresh
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8293 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8293 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5772 RP No. 100183 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 100183 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN:
BASAPPA S/O. MAHAGUNDAPPA @ MAGUNDAPPA KANTHI @ GAJI, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KOTEKAL, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587201.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.R. BARAHANAPUR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
BHAIRAPPA S/O. MAHAGUNDAPPA @ MAGUNDAPPA KANTHI @ GAJI, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TIMMASAGAR, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-5.
2. MALLIKARJUN S/O. BHAIRAPPA KANTHI @ GAJI, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TIMMASAGAR, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587201.
3. RANGAPPA S/O. BHAIRAPPA KANTHI @ GAJI, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TIMMASAGAR, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587201.
4.
RANGAPPA SANGAPPA KALANNAVAR, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5772 RP No. 100183 of 2024
R/O. TIMMASAGAR, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587201.
5. FAKRUSAB S/O. DASTAGIRISAB BADAMI, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. ULLAGADDI ONI, HALAPET, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101.
6. BASAPPA S/O. MARITAMMAPPA GANGASHETTI, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TIMMASAGAR, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587201.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW/ RECALL THE
ORDER DATED 16.01.2024 PASSED IN RSA NO.5547/2010 BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the petitioner.
Perusal of the order sheet would indicate that, petitioner has not complied with the office objections despite granting sufficient time. This would indicate
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5772 RP No. 100183 of 2024
that, petitioner is not interested to pursue the petition. Therefore, the Review Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8