IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1315 of 2018 1. Premti Tigga D/O Late Mr. Nemhas Tigga, 52 yrs. resident of Karma, P.O & P.S.:- Jhumritelaiya, District- Koderma - 825489 2. Glady Bage D/O Late Herman Bage 55 yrs. resident of Karma, P.O & P.S.:- Jhumritelaiya, District- Koderma – 825489 3. Rupkala Ceroline Singh D/O Late Manohar Singh, 58 yrs. resident of Karma, P.O & P.S. :- Jhumritelaiya, District- Koderma – 825489 4. Sima Chakraborty D/O Late Ramesh Chandra Chakraborty, 56 yrs. resident of Karma, P.O & P.S. :- Jhumritelaiya, District- Koderma – 825489 5. Anna Topno D/O Late Titus Topno, 58 yrs. resident of Karma, P.O & P.S.:- Jhumritelaiya, District- Koderma – 825489 6. Naimi Bage D/O Late Haren Bage, 58 yrs. resident of Karma, P.O & P.S. :- Jhumritelaiya, District- Koderma - 825489 ... Petitioners Versus 1. Union of India through, The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Jaisalmer House, P.O & P.S: Man Singh Road, New Delhi 110 001 2. Director General, Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Jaisalmer House, P.O & P.S: Mansingh Road, New Delhi 110 001 3. Sr. Accounts Officer, Pay & Accounts Office, 5th Floor Shram Shakti Bhavan, P.O & P.S: Rafi, Marg, New Delhi 110 001 4. Welfare Commissioner, Labour & Welfare Organisation, Karma, District:- Koderma-825489 Now at Sharam Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. : - Doranda, District :- Ranchi-834002 5. Asstt. Welfare Commissioner, Labour & Welfare Organisation, Karma, Jhumritelaiya, District-Koderma-825489, now at Sharam Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. : - Doranda, District :- Ranchi-834002 … … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Kumar Trivedi, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kr. Trivedi, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Radha Krishan Gupta, C.G.C. Ms. Pinky Shaw, Advocate --------- 14/Dated: 25.02.2025 Since the impugned order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ranchi on 16.02.2017 in OA/051/00132/2015 merely remitted the matter back to the respondents for consideration afresh by the respondents after recording a finding that the pleadings, arguments do not deal with an aspect called ‘bunching’ and also recording that the order passed by the respondents is vague, we see no reason to entertain this writ petition. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) APK/VK