Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8291 (GAU)

SAIDUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/561/2024 · 2025-02-17

Manash Ranjan Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010040882024 2025:GAU-AS:1715 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/561/2024 SAIDUL HOQUE S/O MAHAR ALI R/O VILL- KHUDIMARI PART-II, P.S. GAURIPUR DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED, MD I H LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 18/02/2025 Heard Mr. M Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. 2. The petitioner, namely, Saidul Hoque, son of Mahar Ali, resident of Village-Khudimari Part-II, P.S. Gauripur, District-Dhubri, has filed this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending his arrest in Basistha P.S. Case No. 91/2024 registered under Sections Page No.# 2/2 120(B)/379 IPC read with Sections 11(1)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Acts, 1960 ad Sections 13(1)/16 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021. 3. During the deliberation of the matter, Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, on instruction submitted that police after completion of investigation of the case has already submitted charge-sheet in said Basistha P.S. Case No. 91/2024 vide Charge-Sheet No. 678/2024 dated 30.11.2024. 4. In view of the above, the petitioner may approach the appropriate forum/authority for his regular bail in said Basistha P.S. Case No. 91/2024 on or before 25.02.2025. 5. Till then (i.e., 25.02.2025), the petitioner shall remain on interim bail granted to him earlier on 04.03.2024 in said Basistha P.S. Case No. 91/2024. 6. With the above observation and direction, this pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant