Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82905 (PNJ)

GURVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/39818/2025 · 2025-07-28

Amarjot Bhatti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-39818-2025 1 131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39818-2025 Date of decision: 28.07.2025 GURVINDER SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: Mr. Lakhwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. **** AMARJOT BHATTI , J (Oral): 1. Petitioner-Gurvinder Singh filed petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of impugned order dated 29.05.2024 (Annexure P-8) (wrongly mentioned as Annexure P-5 in headnote) vide which his bail was cancelled and bail bonds and surety bonds were forfeited to the State and he was ordered to be summoned through warrant of arrest for 25.07.2024. Now as per recent order dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P-7), proclamation proceedings have been started qua him. 2. It is explained that there was no intentional absence on the part of petitioner, but due to wrong noting down of the date he could not appear before the learned trial Court. Petitioner is ready to face the trial and abide by the terms and conditions of bail order. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On advance notice, Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana, appears and accepts notice on behalf of State. 5. All relevant zimni orders are annexed with the present MONIKA RANI 2025.07.28 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-39818-2025 2 petition. As per zimni order dated 29.05.2024 (Anneuxre P-8), two prosecution witnesses were present in the Court when petitioner Gurvinder Singh absented and his arrest warrants were issued for 25.07.2024. His arrest warrants were issued by the trial Court time and again and the same received back unexecuted. The trial Court passed order dated 29.05.2025 vide which his proclamation proceedings have been started as detailed therein. The explanation given by the petitioner is unjustified. The conduct of petitioner shows that he deliberately absented before the trial Court on 29.05.2024 when two witnesses had come present for giving their testimony in the said trial. 6. In the light of aforesaid factual position, present petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with the direction to surrender before the trial Court within 10 days from today and on his surrender bail application filed by the petitioner be disposed of within a week. 7. In case the petitioner fails to comply this direction the trial Court may proceed as per law. 8. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 28.07.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.07.28 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document