PIYUSH SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WPIL/2121/2025 · 2025-08-05
Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82897 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82897 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132993-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2121 of 2025 Petitioner :- Piyush Shukla and another Respondent :- State of U.P. and another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Singh, Rakesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- A.K. Goyal (A.C.S.C.), Akanksha Sharma Hon'ble Arun Bhansali, Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra, J.
1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed seeking to question the eligibility condition in the counselling process pursuant to NEET UG - 2025.
2. Having gone through the averments contained in the petition, we find that the petitioners have failed to show any public interest involved in the matter so as to maintain the petition in the nature of public interest.
3. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. We leave it open for the affected parties to question the eligibility, in case they have any grievance/occasion arises. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 SL/Jyotsana (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Digitally signed by :- SHYAM LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad