KARNATAKA BAITUL HUJJAJ TRUST (REGD) v. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF
CRP/378/2018 · 2025-11-20
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82893 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82893 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48344 CRP No. 378 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 378 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA BAITUL HUJJAJ TRUST (REGD) OFFICE OF THE TRUST AT NO.109, MILLIA BUILDING, N.R.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRSIDENT, DR.MUMTAZ AHMED KHAN, NOW AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, S/O MR.Y.ISMAIL KHAN, LATE, RESIDING PRESENTLY AT FLAT NO.202 BERLIE STREE, LANGFORD TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 025. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.V. VEDACHALA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
2.
SRI. SYED AJAZ AHMED APPOINTED AS ADMINISTRATOR, FOR KARNATAKA BAITUL HUJJAJ TRUST, SERVICE C/O AT THE OFFICE OF THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SABAHATH SULTANA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48344 CRP No. 378 of 2018
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 83(9) OF THE WAQF ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2018 PASSED IN APPEAL NO.3/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL BENGALURU DIVISION BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL NO.3/17 FILED UNDER SECTION 64(4) R/W/S 83 (2) OF THE WAQF ACT 1995.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER
After addressing the arguments for some time,
learned counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
"The petitioner above named seeks leave to withdraw the above revision petition.
Hence, this memo.”
Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43