Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82893 (KAR)

KARNATAKA BAITUL HUJJAJ TRUST (REGD) v. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF

CRP/378/2018 · 2025-11-20

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48344 CRP No. 378 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 378 OF 2018 BETWEEN: KARNATAKA BAITUL HUJJAJ TRUST (REGD) OFFICE OF THE TRUST AT NO.109, MILLIA BUILDING, N.R.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRSIDENT, DR.MUMTAZ AHMED KHAN, NOW AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, S/O MR.Y.ISMAIL KHAN, LATE, RESIDING PRESENTLY AT FLAT NO.202 BERLIE STREE, LANGFORD TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 025. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.V. VEDACHALA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. SRI. SYED AJAZ AHMED APPOINTED AS ADMINISTRATOR, FOR KARNATAKA BAITUL HUJJAJ TRUST, SERVICE C/O AT THE OFFICE OF THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SABAHATH SULTANA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48344 CRP No. 378 of 2018 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 83(9) OF THE WAQF ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2018 PASSED IN APPEAL NO.3/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL BENGALURU DIVISION BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL NO.3/17 FILED UNDER SECTION 64(4) R/W/S 83 (2) OF THE WAQF ACT 1995. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The petitioner above named seeks leave to withdraw the above revision petition. Hence, this memo.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43