JIYAULHUQ P.A. v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/21941/2025 · 2025-09-19
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82892 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82892 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.No.21941 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.09.2025 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.21941 of 2025 Jiyaulhuq ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, CSCID Police Station, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. ... Respondent (Crime No.202 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in respect of Crime No.202 of 2025 on the file of the CSCID Police Station, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.Natraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.21941 of 2025
Order 1982 read with Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No.202 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that based on the secret information, the respondent police went to the scene of occurrence and found that the petitioner along with other accused were involved in illegal transportation of 4000 kgs of PDS rice for the purpose of selling the same in the black market Hence, the case.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the petitioner is having nine previous cases of similar nature. He further reported that the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail petition was dismissed by this Court on 14.07.2025 in Crl.OP.No.18460 of 2025. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the gravity 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.21941 of 2025 of an offence committed by the petitioner and also taking note of the fact that there is no change of circumstances after the dismissal of the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail petition, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 19.09.2025 Vv To
1. The Inspector of Police, CSCID Police Station, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.
2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.21941 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR
, J.
Vv Crl.O.P.No.21941 of 2025 19.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.21941 of 2025 5/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis