Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8289 (PAT)

Panchdeo Pandit @ Pandav Pandit v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2701/2025 · 2025-02-15

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2701 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2024 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Panchdeo Pandit @ Pandav Pandit Son of Laxmi Pandit Resident of Vill- Haripur, P.S.- Allouli, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 15-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Allouli P.S. Case No. 157 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and 27 of Arms Act. 3. As per prosecution case, the husband of the informant went for nature's call and did not return back. Thereafter, her devar called and informed her that someone has killed her husband whose deadbody was found lying in the bansbitti. Informant has firm belief that nine named accused persons along with some unknown had committed murder of her husband. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2701 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/2 present case. It is submitted that there is dispute between informant's husband and the family member of Laxmi Pandit because the accused persons suspected that he is involved in the elopement of daughter of one co-accused Santosh Pandit. Except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner and the entire family members of the petitioner have been arrayed as accused. Petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and is in custody since 12.08.2024. 5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two surities of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Allouli P.S. Case No. 157 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T