NAZIR AHMAD WANI AND ORS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/1703/2025 · 2025-07-22
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8288 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8288 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 150 Suppl. List IN HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 1703/2025 Nazir Ahmad Wani and Ors. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Shuja ul Haq, Adv. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 22.07.2025
1. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners would feel satisfied, if the instant petition is
disposed of by directing the respondents to accord due
consideration to the representation [Annexure-III of the writ petition] alleged to have been filed by the petitioners on 30th January, 2025, within some reasonable time frame.
2. Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Dy.AG, who, on the asking of the Court, has caused appearance on behalf of the respondents, submits that he is not averse to the disposal of the instant writ petition provided the same is directed to be disposed of under rules and in accordance with law.
3. Accordingly, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of at its threshold by directing the respondents to accord due consideration to the representation
[Annexure-II of the writ petition] stated to have been filed by the petitioners under rules and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this Order along with writ petition and copy of enclosed Annexures are made available to the respondents.
4. The writ petition is disposed of in the manner indicated above.
5. Needless to say, that the consideration order to be passed by the respondents be conveyed to the petitioners through registered post.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 22.07.2025
“Shamim Dar”