Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82869 (PNJ)

NEETU v. JAI KRISHAN ABHIR

COCP/3665/2025 · 2025-09-15

Harpreet Kaur Jeewan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

224 224 224 224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH COCP COCP COCP COCP----3665 3665 3665 3665----2025 2025 2025 2025 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of decision : Date of decision : Date of decision : Date of decision : 11115555.09 .09 .09 .09.2025 .2025 .2025 .2025 Neetu ...Petitioner Versus Jai Krishan Abhir ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Sukhdev Singh Gopera, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harshit Singla, AAG, Haryana. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for alleged non- compliance of the order dated 02.11.2023 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Writ Court in CWP-1658-2016. 2. Compliance report filed by way of affidavit dated 08.09.2025 of Mr. Dusmanta Kumar Behera, IAS, Director General, Development and Panchayats Department, Haryana is taken on record. A copy there of is supplied to the opposite side. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. 3. On the last date of hearing, the following order was passed:- “2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petition filed by the petitioner-Neetu was disposed of vide order dated 02.11.2023, in terms of Shiksha Devi vs. Haryana State Federation of Consumers Co-operative Wholesale Stores Ltd., passed in CWP- 21917-2016, Date of Decision: 02.08.2022 (Annexure P-2), as such, the petitioner is also entitled to receive interest @ 6% p.a. on the amount, which was to be refunded to the petitioner. It is further contended that the recovery made from the petitioner has been refunded. However, the interest on the said amount @ 6% p.a. has not been paid to the petitioner. ATUL SETHI 2025.09.18 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and seeks an accommodation to assist as to how the petitioner is not entitled to receive interest @ 6% p.a. by way of filing a written response. 5. Adjourned to 15.09.2025.” 4. Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has informed that order dated 02.11.2023 stands complied with and interest amounting to Rs.1,32,531/- (calculated @ 6% per annum) stands paid to the petitioner through RTGS. The receipt dated 19.08.2025 is Annexure R-1. 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, nothing survives in the present petition, as such, same is disposed of having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner has the liberty to approach the Department by moving a representation, in case there is any discrepancy in the calculations. 6. Disposed of accordingly. 7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 11115555.09 .09 .09 .09.2025 .2025 .2025 .2025 [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] atulsethi JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No ATUL SETHI 2025.09.18 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh