Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82863 (ALL)

SHUBHAM KAUSHIK v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/26707/2025 · 2025-08-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145566-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26707 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shubham Kaushik Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- Abhinava Krishna Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition, certain developments have taken place which are required to be challenged. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 4 – Firozabad/ Shikohabad Development Authority, state that they have no objection to the aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. With the aforesaid leave, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 23.8.2025 NLY Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad