- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46603 WP No. 29008 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 29008 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI.S.N.MARALLUSIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF SRI.NAGARAJAPPA, RESIDENT OF K.SHANKARANAHALLI VILLAGE, ARSIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 573 117. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.DINESH C.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPOT MANAGER, K S R T C, ARSIKERE UNIT, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIVISION, ARSIKERE, KARNATAKA - 573 103. 2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, K.S.R.T.C, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALURU, KARNATAKA -577 101. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, CENTRAL OFFICE KSRTC, DOUBLE ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.H.R.RENUKA., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46603 WP No. 29008 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Dinesh.C.R., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.H.R.Renuka., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 06.07.2021 vide Annexure-G and the order dated 30.11.2021 vide annexure-J. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Suffice it to note that the petitioner is a Driver and is an regular employee of the Corporation. He came under a disciplinary inquiry proceedings and was visited with an order of punishment on 30.11.2021. The charge sheet and the order of punishment are called into question in this Writ Petition. It is pivotal to note that the charge sheet and the order of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46603 WP No. 29008 of 2025 punishment cannot be called into question by invoking the writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, I decline to exercise power under Writ jurisdiction in the matter. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE TKN/KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1