Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8284 (UTT)

TANIYA AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/673/2025 · 2025-07-02

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 02nd July, 2025 WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL No. 673 OF 2025 Taniya and Another …Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others …Respondents Presence:- Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. V.N. Maulaki, learned Brief Holder for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has handed over the copy of some threatening messages sent by respondent no. 6 to petitioner no. 2. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General would submit that in compliance with the earlier order of this Court dated 25.06.2025, protection was given to the petitioners. He would further submit that in case there is any further threat perception to the life of the 1 petitioners, the concerned SHO shall make a fresh assessment of the threat perception and will provide necessary protection, if required. 4. The submission of learned DAG is placed on record. 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition stands disposed off, as no further orders are required. 6. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed off. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _______________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 02nd July, 2025 UJJWAL 2