Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8284 (AP)

M. SEETHARAMI REDDY, CUDDAPAH v. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, CUDDAPAH & 2 OTHERS

WP/21535/2006 · 2025-09-15

Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010087992006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 21535/2006 Between: 1. M. SEETHARAMI REDDY, CUDDAPAH, S/O. M. OBUL REDDY, DRAUGHTSMAN GRADE-I, ANNAMAIAH PROJECT DIVISION, CUDDAPAH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER CUDDAPAH 2 OTHERS, I & CAD IRRIGATION CIRCLE, CUDDAPAH. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CUDDAPAH DIVISION, CUDDAPAH. 3. L SREENIVASULU REDDY, DRAUGHTSMAN GRADE-I, O/O. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPT. CUDDAPAH DIVISION, CUDDAPAH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SUDHAKAR REDDY & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV 2. D KODANDARAMI REDDY 2 The Court made the following Order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner both in the forenoon and afternoon sessions. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition. 2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J _______________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J Date : 16.09.2025 BMS