IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1859 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-461 Year-2024 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Sintu Chauhan @ Pintu Chauhan S/o- Sunil Chauhan Village- Ganhati Ps- Pakribarawan Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shabina Talat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 05-02-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 30(d) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 600 litres of fermented jawa mahua from an open field. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of chowkidar. It is also submitted that it appears that chowkidar in order to save the real culprit falsely implicated the petitioner who is a person with clean antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1859 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2025 2/2 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No.461/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 6. It is made clear that the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T