Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8283 (BOM)

MUKUND KESHAVRAO KHATKE v. JIJABAI GULABRAO DHUMAL, L.RS. RAMESH GULABRAO DHUMAL AND OTHERS

CA/1616/2024 · 2025-02-14

Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

906 CA NO.1616.2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1616 OF 2024 IN WP/9134/2014 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9134 OF 2014 MUKUND KESHAVRAO KHATKE VERSUS JIJABAI GULABRAO DHUMAL, L.RS. RAMESH GULABRAO DHUMAL AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P. S. Paranjape Advocate for Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. D. G. Nagode (in W.P.) … CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. Dated : February 14, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Present civil application is filed by the petitioner for bringing the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 3 on record. It is stated in the application that during the pendency of the proceedings, respondent No. 3 has expired on 08.12.2023. Therefore, the application is filed for bringing the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 3 i.e. respondent No. 3-A and 3-B on record. 2. After issuance of notice, respondents No. 3-A and 3-B are served as per Bailiff Report. 2025:BHC-AUG:4257 906 CA NO.1616.2024 -2- 3. In view of service to respondents No. 3-A and 3-B, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and petitioner to take necessary steps to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 3 on record by way of amendment within a period of two weeks. 4. Civil application is disposed of. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) Omkar Joshi