CRA-AS-280-2024 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 CRA-AS-280-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 05, 2025 ANGREJ SINGH .....Appellant (s) Vs. KAUR SINGH ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate for the appellant. ---- RAMESH KUMARI J. (ORAL) 1. The applicant has filed the present application seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed in a complaint case instituted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘NI Act’), whereby the complaint filed by the applicant was dismissed and the accused was acquitted. 2. The limited question arising for consideration in the present proceedings is whether an appeal against an order of acquittal passed in a complaint case under Section 138 of the NI Act can be entertained under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. at the instance of the complainant? 3. The issue is no longer res integra. In ‘M/s Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. 2025 INSC 804: 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208’, the Hon'ble Supreme Court authoritatively held that a complainant in a prosecution under Section 138 of the NI Act, qualifies as a ‘victim’ under Section 2(wa) of the Cr.P.C., being the person, who suffers financial loss due Deepak Patwal 2025.09.08 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-AS-280-2024 (O&M) 2 to the dishonour of a cheque. Consequently, such a complainant is entitled to pursue an appeal against acquittal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C., without the requirement of seeking special leave under Section 378(4) of the Cr.P.C. 4. In view of the authoritative pronouncement in M/s Celestium Financial's case (supra) and the view taken by this Court also in CRM-A- 1320-MA-2016 titled as ‘Rajat Deep Versus Prince’ disposed of on 21.07.2025, the present application is disposed of with a direction that the learned Sessions Judge concerned shall first decide application under Section 5 of Limitation Act and if that application is decided in favour of the appellant, shall treat the present appeal as an appeal filed under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. and assign the same to an appropriate Court for disposal on merits, in accordance with law. 5. 5. The Registry is directed to transmit this order along with copy of the complete paper book and return the trial Court record, if received, to the learned Sessions Judge. (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE September 05, 2025 Deepak Patwal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes / No Whether reportable: Yes / No Deepak Patwal 2025.09.08 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document