M/S ASHOK KUMAR CONTRACTOR ROHTAK v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/20237/2026 · 2026-07-21
Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8282 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8282 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
CORAM:- HON'BLE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR
Mr. Viresh Dahiya, Advocate
Ms. Sonakshi Chaudhary, Advocate and
Ms. Tannu Ahlawat, Advocate for the petitioner.
for the respondents.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J.
1.
Disposed of.
2.
For detailed order s 2025 titled as Luxmi Traders Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others.
1. Whether Speaking/reasoned
2. Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****
VERSUS
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Viresh Dahiya, Advocate Ms. Sonakshi Chaudhary, Advocate and Ms. Tannu Ahlawat, Advocate for the petitioner. for the respondents.
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)
Disposed of. For detailed order see order of even date passed in Luxmi Traders Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others.
1. Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
2. Whether Reportable Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
...PETITIONER(S)
….RESPONDENT(S) THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Ms. Sonakshi Chaudhary, Advocate and
ee order of even date passed in CWP-27139- Luxmi Traders Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others.
Yes/No Yes/No RENU SHARMA 2026.07.23 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document