- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43974 WP No. 44971 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 44971 OF 2013 (L-TER) BETWEEN: SRI. SRINIVAS MURTHY @ KNS MURTHY, S/O. LATE NARASAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT KUMBIPALYA, BYATHA POST, HURUDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, TUMKUR-572140. …PETITIONER (ABSENT) AND: TRANSYSTEMS LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, TOYOTA TECHNO PARK, NO.20, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562109. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. ROOPASHRI, ADVOCATGE FOR SRI. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43974 WP No. 44971 of 2013 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner is absent. Smt.Roopasri.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.Somashekar., counsel for the respondent has appeared through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 28.10.2025. On that day, taking note of the memo and affidavit, counsel Sri.L.Muralidhar Peshwa., was permitted to retire from the case and the office was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and the petition was ordered to be listed on 03.11.2025. The petition is listed today by printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list. As already noted above, the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43974 WP No. 44971 of 2013 or through video conferencing. The petitioner has neither engaged the services of a counsel nor conducted the case as a party in person. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in 2013. Now we are in the month of November, 2025. The petition is pending from twelve years. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stands disposed of and interim order, if any, stands discharged. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP,KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14