CWP-29686-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (109) CWP-29686-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: - 23.07.2026 Azad Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. AVS Parmar, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 07.07.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order: - “Present: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate (Through VC) and Mr. A.V.S. Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. **** Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an adjournment to place on record the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been referred to in Annexure P-5 and to state as to whether the petitioner has filed the said SLP. Adjourned to 23.07.2026. 07.07.2026” NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.23 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CWP-29686-2025 (O&M) -2- 2. Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that the issue in hand is covered by the judgment dated 07.07.2026 passed by this Court in CM-16441-CWP-2024; CM-2726-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-30481-2018 titled as “Parkashi Vs. State of Haryana and others”. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the above, the present writ petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after complying with the earlier order. 4. Disposed of, with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 23, 2026 naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.23 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement