Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-20967-2025 Date of Decision: 24.07.2025 Ashish
......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to decide his revision in a time bound manner.
2. Mr. Ajay Ghangas, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has preferred revision before DGP, Haryana on 04.10.2024. He is out of service, thus, his revision deserves to be heard at the earliest.
3. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court, submits that competent authority would decide revision of the petitioner within 2 months from today.
4. Mr. Ghangas agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.
5. In the wake of statement of both sides, instant petition stands
disposed of. 24.07.2025
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes Whether reportable
No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.25 14:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document