- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41771 CA NO. 214 OF 2024 IN CA NO. 120 OF 2018 IN COP NO. 143 OF 2011 AND COP NO. 193 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 214 OF 2024 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 120 OF 2018 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 143 OF 2011 AND COMPANY PETITION NO. 193 OF 2011 BETWEEN: CAPT. G.R.GOPINATH, S/O. GORUR RAMASWAMY IYENGAR AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT NO.272, RAJNIGANDHA BLOCK, GOLDEN APARTMENT, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. …APPLICANT (BY SRI.VIVEK HOLLA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. DECCAN CARGO EXPRESS LOGISTICS PVT. LTD., (IN LIQN), AT OFFICE OF OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, CORPORATE BHAVAN, NO. 26-27 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWER M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.S.MAHADEVAN., ADVOCATE FOR OL) Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41771 CA NO. 214 OF 2024 IN CA NO. 120 OF 2018 IN COP NO. 143 OF 2011 AND COP NO. 193 OF 2011 THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 6 AND 9 OF THE COMPANY COURT RULES, 1959 READ WITH ORDER 11 RULES 14 AND 15 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the applicant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.K.S.Mahadevan., counsel for the Official Liquidator has appeared in person. The application is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objection. As could be seen from the application papers, the application is filed on 12.06.2024 and the office has raised objections on 18.06.2024. Now we are in October 2025. It's been one year four months, so far office objections are not complied with. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41771 CA NO. 214 OF 2024 IN CA NO. 120 OF 2018 IN COP NO. 143 OF 2011 AND COP NO. 193 OF 2011 As already noted above, when the case is called, the applicant is not represented. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application. Hence, the Company Application is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN/KMV List No.:1 Sl No.:16