Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82796 (KAR)

MARISWAMY S L v. PURUSHOTHAMA D K

MFA/8275/2025 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.8275/2025 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.8829/2025) BETWEEN: MARISWAMY S L AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE NINGEGOWDA, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.340, 2ND ANGANAVADI ROAD, KOORGALLI, BELAVADI, MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT 570 018. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI.SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . PURUSHOTHAMA D K AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O.LATE KESHAVA D.R., RESIDING AT ANK STREET, ARKALAGUDU TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 (DRIVER OF SWIFT CAR BEARING NO.KA-09-P-6610) 2 . SMT.KAMALAMMA L.L. AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O.D.R.KESHAVAMURTHY, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.774, VINAYAKANAGAR KOTE, ARKALGUD TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 102. (OWNER OF SWIFT CAR BEARING NO.KA-09-P-6610) 3 . GENERAL MANAGER, M/S.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LIMITED, 2ND FLOOR, CH-66-2904/1, SAPTHA SWARA COMPLEX, OPP. RELIANCE HOME FINANCE, KANTHARAJA URS ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE. ( ORIGINAL OFFICE AT E-8, EPIP, SITAPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN - 303 022 (POLICY NO.10003/31/20/303340 VALID FROM 19.09.2019 TO 18.09.2020) ….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.23.02.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.1062/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, AND MACT, MYSORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.5,75,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh Seventy Five Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the claims tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER TS