HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28245 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. 3. Sri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents informs that the tender has been allotted to the petitioner and he has commenced the work pursuant to the said allotment of tender. He brings on record the copy of the order passed by the authorities. He further submits that no further cause of action survives in the present writ petition. 4. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 9, 2025 Arif Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janardan Singh, Raj Kumar Kesari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) M/S. Ashish Enterprises .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad