Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8278 (RAJ)

RAJ KUMAR S/O SH. MATU RAM v. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/2857/2025 · 2025-02-27

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8694] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2857/2025 Raj Kumar S/o Sh. Matu Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Mankdo, Jhunjhunu- 333504. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through Its Chairman- Cum-Managing Director, Hathi Bhata Power House, Jaipur Road, Ajmer. 2. Secretary (Admn), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel, Makadwali Road, Ajmer- 305004. 3. Assistant Engineer (Rural), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Khetri Town, Jhunjhunu- Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 27/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation within a period of 7 days before the Competent Authority. 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same within a period of 15 days, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. [2025:RJ-JP:8694] (2 of 2) [CW-2857/2025] 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/116