GURMEET AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/8083/2025 · 2025-07-29
Manisha Batra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 149 CRWP-8083-2025 Date of Decision: 29.07.2025 Gurmeet and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA **** Present: Mr. Rahul Soi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** MANISHA BATRA
, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 10 and take action on their representation dated 13.07.2025 (Annexure P-3). 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 13.07.2025 to respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf NISHA 2025.07.30 10.26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8083-2025 -2- of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply a copy of the petition to her. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-The Superintendent of Police, Kaithal to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 13.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 11.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously. 7.
It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE July 29, 2025 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2025.07.30 10.26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document