Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82764 (KAR)

VEERABHADRAPPA G v. SMT SHIVAMMA @ REKHA

WP/6510/2024 · 2025-11-26

S Vishwajith Shetty

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49079 WP No. 6510 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 6510 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VEERABHADRAPPA G S/O SHANMUKHAPPA G.V AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O LINGADAHALLI VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALLUK AND DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA, ADV., - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. SHIVAMMA @ REKHA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA M H AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O KANDANAKOVI VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALLUK AND DISTRICT. 2. GOWDRU PALAKSHAPPA S/O RUDRAPPA (DEAD) MAHADEVAMMA W/O GOWDRU PALAKSHAPPA (DEAD) VEDHAMURTHY S/O GOWDRU PALAKSHAPPA (DEAD) SMT. ASHWINI W/O VEDHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO 689/42, NEAR KARIYAMMA TEMPLE, S.S. HOSPITAL ROAD NITTUVALLI, DAVANAGERE. 3. VINAY V. GOWDA VEDHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT NO.689/42, NEAR KARIYAMMA TEMPLE, S.S. HOSPITAL ROAD NITTUVALLI Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49079 WP No. 6510 of 2024 DAVANAGERE. 4. PARAMERSHWARAPPA G.S S/O G.S SHADAKAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O SHEKHARAPPA BADAVANE AVARAGERE, DAVANAGERE TALLUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO-QUASH THE COMPROMISE DECREE PASSED BY THE SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND 4TH ACJ AND JMFC DAVANAGERE IN OS NO. 568/2015 DTD 08.07.2023 IN SO FAR AS ITEM NO. 3 OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A THE PLAINT CONTAINING THE PROPERTY DETAILS IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER 1. This Court on 17.11.2025 has passed a peremptory order granting a week's time to the petitioner to comply with office objections failing which, petition shall be dismissed for non- prosecution. 2. The matter is called twice today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Office objections are - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49079 WP No. 6510 of 2024 not yet complied. Therefore, in view of the order dated 17.11.2025, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5